- From: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
- Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 11:51:42 -0500
- To: "Gregg Vanderheiden" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, "Jason White" <jasonw@ariel.its.unimelb.edu.au>, "WAI WCAG List" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Gregg's right. But the problem may be solvable: we already have an example of a site that pre-dates publication of WCAG 2.0 as a Recommendation-- pages created or last updated before [pubdate] conform to WCAG 1.0 at [Priority]. Pages created or updated after [pubdate] conform to WCAG 2.0, L-whatever. Is this adaptable to the current situatoin? John s "Good design is accessible design" John Slatin, Director Accessibility Institute University of Texas at Austin 1 University station Stop G9600 Austin, TX 78712, USA Phone +1.512.495.4288 Fax +1.512.495.4524 cell +1.512.784.7533 email jslatin@austin.utexas.edu www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility/ -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Gregg Vanderheiden Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2006 10:06 AM To: 'Jason White'; 'WAI WCAG List' Subject: RE: What does WCAG mean by "a set of Web units" That doesn't work I don't think. Problems if you have different levels of conformance for different parts. Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison The Player for my DSS sound file is at http://tinyurl.com/dho6b > -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org > [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jason White > Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2006 1:50 AM > To: WAI WCAG List > Subject: Re: What does WCAG mean by "a set of Web units" > > > On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 09:06:42PM -0500, John M Slatin wrote: > > I think the third definition in Loretta's list might work: > > > > <blockquote> > > - the contents of the conformance statement > > </blockquote> > Or, to avoid the possibility of interpreting this as meaning > the text of the conformance claim: > <blockquote> > All Web units within the scope of conformance. > </blockquote> > > Somewhere in the guidelines it should be clarified that if a > conformance claim refers only to a single WEb unit, which is > linked to other Web units subject to conformance claims by > the same entity, then all such Web units are aggregated for > the purpose of determining the "scope of conformance". > > >
Received on Sunday, 20 August 2006 16:52:05 UTC