- From: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
- Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 08:56:24 -0500
- To: "Jason White" <jasonw@ariel.its.unimelb.edu.au>, "WAI WCAG List" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Good catch, Jason, thanks. Here's one more tweak to make the point unmistakable (I hope...): [was]All Web units within the scope of conformance. [new]All Web units within the scope of the conformance claim. John "Good design is accessible design" John Slatin, Director Accessibility Institute University of Texas at Austin 1 University station Stop G9600 Austin, TX 78712, USA Phone +1.512.495.4288 Fax +1.512.495.4524 cell +1.512.784.7533 email jslatin@austin.utexas.edu www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility/ -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jason White Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2006 1:50 AM To: WAI WCAG List Subject: Re: What does WCAG mean by "a set of Web units" On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 09:06:42PM -0500, John M Slatin wrote: > I think the third definition in Loretta's list might work: > > <blockquote> > - the contents of the conformance statement > </blockquote> Or, to avoid the possibility of interpreting this as meaning the text of the conformance claim: <blockquote> All Web units within the scope of conformance. </blockquote> Somewhere in the guidelines it should be clarified that if a conformance claim refers only to a single WEb unit, which is linked to other Web units subject to conformance claims by the same entity, then all such Web units are aggregated for the purpose of determining the "scope of conformance".
Received on Sunday, 20 August 2006 13:56:37 UTC