- From: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
- Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 21:06:42 -0500
- To: "Loretta Guarino Reid" <lguarino@adobe.com>, "WAI WCAG List" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <6EED8F7006A883459D4818686BCE3B3B03A8F746@MAIL01.austin.utexas.edu>
I think the third definition in Loretta's list might work: <blockquote> - the contents of the conformance statement </blockquote> The others have problems: "Web site" is the term we were trying to stay away from in the first place because it's so loose and baggy. The notion of a set of Web units "intended by an author to be used together" begs the question of how we test for intention, and even if we figured that out we might be stuck with the idea of "an author," a notion that much current Web practice simply ignores: authorship is corporate and multiple, and many individuals contribute Web content without any knowledge of the context in which it will appear (this is one of the reasons we had to wrestle with aggregated content when describing conformance claims). I think the final bullet, about all the Web units that appear in a graph starting from a given point, raises similar concerns, though it *might* work (is there a way to test out the idea of such a graph? Or have I misread the item? John "Good design is accessible design" John Slatin, Director Accessibility Institute University of Texas at Austin 1 University station Stop G9600 Austin, TX 78712, USA Phone +1.512.495.4288 Fax +1.512.495.4524 cell +1.512.784.7533 email jslatin@austin.utexas.edu www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility/ -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Loretta Guarino Reid Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 8:29 PM To: WAI WCAG List Subject: What does WCAG mean by "a set of Web units" A number of our success criteria involve properties of a Web unit within a set of Web units: 2.4.1 A mechanism is available to bypass blocks of content that are repeated on multiple Web units. 2.4.2 More than one way is available to locate content within a set of Web units where content is not the result of, or a step in, a process or task. 2.4.7 Information about the user's location within a set of Web units is available. 3.2.3 Navigational mechanisms that are repeated on multiple Web units within a set of Web units occur in the same relative order each time they are repeated, unless a change is initiated by the user. 3.2.4 Components that have the same functionality within a set of Web units are identified consistently. We received several comments that point out that the set of Web units is not well defined, and that these SC can be satisfied trivially if the "set of Web units" is just the Web unit itself. What "set of Web units" should an author be considering so that we gain the accessibility benefits of these SC? Clearly the entire web is too large and the Web unit itself is too small. We started a discussion at the end of today's call about what we mean, in these SC, by a set of Web units. Some of the ideas that were discussed included: - the web site - the contents of the conformance statement - a set of Web units that is intended by its author to be used together - all of the Web units within a site that can be reached from the graph starting at some root Web unit. More thoughts or suggestions? Loretta Loretta Guarino Reid lguarino@adobe.com Adobe Systems, Acrobat Engineering
Received on Sunday, 20 August 2006 02:06:52 UTC