- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 15:11:46 -0500
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <00b001c69edc$e96dd1c0$8b17a8c0@NC6000BAK>
Hi all, Well, usually (not always - grin, but usually) there is a reason for what we do and how we do it. Let me try to address some of the questions about minutes etc. The minutes are intended to record all of the decisions of the group. The context for the decisions, however, necessarily comes from multiple external resources. The comments made during the meeting generally either supplement or refer to all of the text we have in front of us from the comments and task force work before the meeting. Without this information they would not make sense or would be misleading. If we included all of this (the comments, the proposals, the input from each member etc) that we cover in each meeting for each of the 15, 30 or 50 comments that we processed each week -- the set of minutes would not be usable by anyone - since they would be reams of pages long. With the number of comments that came in, - and the fact that range all the way from telling us about typos and where to add commas, to different theories of accessibility, - it is a challenge to get through and develop action steps and responses to them all. And we don't want to mis-capture anything in the minutes since we are using them as our formal record. As it is we often sit silent on the call waiting for the minute taker to catch up (since they also are participating). Taking minutes is a difficult task and we appreciate the efforts of the people who volunteer (or get volunteered) to do this each week. So we have been capturing exactly what the actions and decisions are for each item at each meeting - but not the reams that go into it. We are cognizant of all the information that must go into this -- and so we have set it up so that each participant can review all of the material, (the comments, task force recommendations, etc. in advance and take as long as they wish to think about and craft their comments and opinions. So people don't have to comment on the spur of the moment or have to process all this for the first time at a meeting. Yes it does take much time (hours) to read process and comment on the items to be covered at each meeting - but that is true of all the participants. And it is the only way we can fairly address each comment that came in. RE: Referring to comments by number. Well we really wish that we did have something other than a number (and shorter than the whole comment) to refer to them by. But we don't. The issues are referred to by number because they have no names or anything else unique that we can use to refer to them by. People send in the comments and we enter them verbatim into the record and give them a number. We always refer to them by number because we don't have anything except the number and the full comment (and that is sometimes very long). We can say "comment referring to 2.3.1" or the like because there may be multiple comments referring to any part. We can't reduce comments to short phrases for two reasons. One, it is always one persons interpretation and simplification of the comment. This is dangerous because it loses much of the comment and colors your reading of the comment. Usually, if the author could have captured what they wanted to say accurately in a short phrase - they did. We have short comments but most are too long to use as a handle. Comments also often cover several parts of the document or different topics. Where possible we break these up into separate comments to make sure we address each part. But this isn't always possible. The best we have found is simply to use the comment number which can be looked up easily in the comment database by just typing it in. You have to go there anyway - to see what the full comment is in order to be fair to the commenter and to make sense out of any resolution and response. Please note that all resolutions are tentative til we get all the comments processed. We don't want to tell one commenter one thing and then change it later. So we are trying to get through all the comments before we send out responses. So at this point we don't have any final resolutions. In fact we are still sending notes back to commenters getting additional information on issues. And working through them all. Thanks for your patience. Gregg
Received on Monday, 3 July 2006 20:12:10 UTC