- From: David MacDonald <befree@magma.ca>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 10:32:53 -0400
- To: "'Gregg Vanderheiden'" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, "'John M Slatin'" <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <002401c69151$c1c046a0$650fa8c0@home>
I like it. access empowers people... ...barriers disable them... www.eramp.com _____ From: Gregg Vanderheiden [mailto:gv@trace.wisc.edu] Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 10:27 AM To: 'John M Slatin'; 'David MacDonald'; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: RE: Definition of "Relationships" Agree. Also talk about form controls Hmmmm So maybe something like: Definition of *Relationships*: "semantic associations between distinct chunks of content" Examples of chunks that have relationships include: a heading and the paragraph which follows it; a section title and the subsections that are within it; a control and its label; the boxes in an organization or flow chart; and table cells and their headers. Other comments? Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison The Player for my DSS sound file is at http://tinyurl.com/dho6b <http://tinyurl.com/cmfd9> _____ From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of John M Slatin Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 7:59 AM To: David MacDonald; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: RE: Definition of "Relationships" Thanks, David! It might be good to add a non-text example, e.g., "Associations between positions shown in an organizational chart" or "Associations beteween decision-points in a flow-chart" or something like that. John "Good design is accessible design." Dr. John M. Slatin, Director Accessibility Institute University of Texas at Austin FAC 248C 1 University Station G9600 Austin, TX 78712 ph 512-495-4288, fax 512-495-4524 email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu Web <http://www.ital.utexas.edu/> http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David MacDonald Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 6:14 PM To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: Definition of "Relationships" I had an action item with Katie to come up with a definition of Relationship. This is the proposal: Definition of *Relationships*: "Semantic associations between distinct chunks of content." Example 1: A heading is in relationship to the paragraph which follows it. Example 2: A section title is in relationship to the subsections that are within it. ----------------------- Discussion: "Semantic" is another way to say "meaningful" (as per the Wikipaedia definition of Semantic) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic So the definition could also be: "Meaningful associations between distinct chunks of content." But I think semantic works better. "chunks" could be replaced by "portions" or "sections" but I think "chunks" is very understandable. David MacDonald access empowers people... ...barriers disable them... www.eramp.com
Received on Friday, 16 June 2006 14:33:54 UTC