W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2006

RE: Definition of "Relationships"

From: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 07:58:35 -0500
Message-ID: <6EED8F7006A883459D4818686BCE3B3B042C8287@MAIL01.austin.utexas.edu>
To: "David MacDonald" <befree@magma.ca>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Thanks, David!
It might be good to add a non-text example, e.g., "Associations between
positions shown in an organizational chart" or "Associations beteween
decision-points in a flow-chart" or something like that.

"Good design is accessible design." 

Dr. John M. Slatin, Director
Accessibility Institute
University of Texas at Austin
FAC 248C
1 University Station G9600
Austin, TX 78712
ph 512-495-4288, fax 512-495-4524
email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu
Web  <http://www.ital.utexas.edu/>

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of David MacDonald
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 6:14 PM
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: Definition of "Relationships"

I had an action item with Katie to come up with a definition of


This is the proposal:


Definition of *Relationships*:


"Semantic associations between distinct chunks of content."

      Example 1: A heading is in relationship to the paragraph which
follows it.
      Example 2:  A section title is in relationship to the subsections
that are within it.






"Semantic" is another way to say "meaningful" (as per the Wikipaedia
definition of Semantic) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic 


So the definition could also be:


"Meaningful associations between distinct chunks of content."  But I
think semantic works better.


"chunks" could be replaced by "portions" or "sections" but I think
"chunks" is very understandable.


David MacDonald


access empowers people...

        ...barriers disable them...



Received on Friday, 16 June 2006 12:58:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:07:45 UTC