Re: CSS Parsed Unambiguously

Christophe wrote:
> Because of the error handling rules at the second level, it seems to me 
> that only correct grammar is necessary for a CSS stylesheet to pass SC 
> 4.1.1. However, anything that does not pass at the second level (according 
> to the most recent CSS specification in your baseline) is outside the 
> baseline. Does this make sense?
I think I understand. If you follow this syntax then you pass:

For example this would fail (missing semicolon):
H1 {
  font-weight: bold
  font-size: 12pt

This would pass (unknown declaration 'rotation' ignored):
H1 {
color: red;
rotation: 70minutes

This would fail (units for '3' not specified):
IMG { border-width: 3 }

Is that what you're suggesting?


Received on Monday, 12 June 2006 14:07:07 UTC