Re: CSS Parsed Unambiguously

> There is no common failure about failing SC 4.1.1 when CSS is invalid.
Yes, I didn't see a failure listed that's why I'm asking. The SC seems to be 
very clear that this would be a failure and, at level 1, would be overkill.

> BTW, what is validity with respect to CSS? Correct grammar according to 
> the grammar defined in the spec? Correct usage of vocabulary defined in 
> the spec?
> -- 
I'm not sure myself and not sure if Björn's earlier message cleared this up.

The W3C's validator can give a CSS file a rating of "valid" while still 
producing many warnings. For example the WCAG2's style sheet is "valid" with 
warnings:
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FTR%2FWCAG20%2Fslicenav.css&usermedium=all

Cheers,
Chris

Received on Friday, 9 June 2006 19:42:20 UTC