RE: nbsp ok for decorative alt? from Andrew Kirkpatrick on 2006-04-10 (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org from April to June 2006)

From: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 05:21:16 -0700
To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <53744A0A1D995C459E975F971E17F56490BF68@namail4.corp.adobe.com>

> My question: Why would you like to allow three possible 
> solutions that need to be implemented in WCAG2.0 conforming 
> user agents when one solution (alt="") would be enough?

I agree. alt=" " should not be OK.  It's not an egregious error, but the
WCAG doesn't need to breathe additional life into this unnecessary
technique.

AWK

Received on Monday, 10 April 2006 12:21:32 UTC