- From: David MacDonald <befree@magma.ca>
- Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:43:23 -0500
- To: "'David MacDonald'" <befree@magma.ca>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <200512272243.jBRMhPSK004989@mail2.magma.ca>
I think the following line would a little better for SC 2.4.5 how to meet. "Provide meaningful link text, unless the link is part of an array of links to different versions (or views) of the same information." David MacDonald .Access empowers people .barriers disable them. www.eramp.com _____ From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David MacDonald Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 5:30 PM To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: SC 2.4.5, meaningful link text This is a response to the editorial note asking for comments, in "Understanding WCAG" Doc, How to Meet Success Criterion 2.4.5" . The note gives an example of when meaningful link text might not be desirable. I agree with this example. When there are several links to different versions of the same document it is perhaps not desirable to have meaningful link text. On the other hand, there is a strong sentiment among screen reader users that I polled when doing some research for this issue, that meaningful link text is extremely important. There is a good case to be made that giving screen readers meaningful link text is compensating for something that sighted users do naturally, skim through links. The screen reader users I polled think this is a very important issue. I suggest something like the following: "Provide meaningful link text, unless the link is part of an array of links to different versions of the same document." Happy New Year David MacDonald .Access empowers people .barriers disable them. www.eramp.com
Received on Tuesday, 27 December 2005 22:43:37 UTC