- From: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpatrick@macromedia.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 12:14:20 -0800
- To: "Gregg Vanderheiden" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <DC9D05204B1E16419D62C12561C9322106AE9EA4@p01exm01.macromedia.com>
I'm no lexicographer. Video: A series of pictures displayed sequentially to simulate motion. Video can be made up of animated or photographic images, or both. AWK ________________________________ From: Gregg Vanderheiden [mailto:gv@trace.wisc.edu] Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 2:56 PM To: Andrew Kirkpatrick; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: RE: clean AND CORRECTED guideline1.1_proposal.html Can you suggest one? Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison ________________________________ From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Kirkpatrick Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 7:39 AM To: Gregg Vanderheiden; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: RE: clean AND CORRECTED guideline1.1_proposal.html It seems that the issue is in how 'video' is defined. I'd like to say that video includes animated content, not just recorded real images. Can a definition for video be added? AWK Can you suggest wording to include in success criterion or in HOW TO MEET? Gregg, How is 'video' defined? Is a long animation 'video'? (e.g. http://site.aol.com/accessibility/press/sample.html). In terms of what users need, there is no difference between this and a recorded movie of actual events, but there is a little ambiguity.
Received on Thursday, 1 December 2005 20:15:33 UTC