- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 13:55:36 -0600
- To: "'Andrew Kirkpatrick'" <akirkpatrick@macromedia.com>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 1 December 2005 19:56:48 UTC
Can you suggest one? Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison _____ From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Kirkpatrick Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 7:39 AM To: Gregg Vanderheiden; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: RE: clean AND CORRECTED guideline1.1_proposal.html It seems that the issue is in how 'video' is defined. I'd like to say that video includes animated content, not just recorded real images. Can a definition for video be added? AWK Can you suggest wording to include in success criterion or in HOW TO MEET? Gregg, How is 'video' defined? Is a long animation 'video'? (e.g. http://site.aol.com/accessibility/press/sample.html). In terms of what users need, there is no difference between this and a recorded movie of actual events, but there is a little ambiguity.
Received on Thursday, 1 December 2005 19:56:48 UTC