Re: parsing issue with SC 2.3.2?

On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 03:45:45PM -0500, Tim Boland wrote:
> 
> SC 2.3.2 states:
> 
> "Content does not violate general flash threshold or red flash threshold"
> 
> How should this sentence be parsed?  What rules of precedence should apply?
I would interpret the "or" as an inclusive disjunction: content does not
violate the general flash threshold, the red flash threshold or both. I think
Gregg's restatement in this thread is clearer, though.

Received on Thursday, 1 December 2005 05:19:38 UTC