- From: Maurizio Boscarol <maurizio@usabile.it>
- Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 18:03:44 +0100
- To: "Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)" <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
- CC: gv@trace.wisc.edu, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) wrote: >----- Messaggio originale ----- > Da: "Maurizio Boscarol"<maurizio@usabile.it> > Inviato: 25/11/05 17.32.37 > A: "Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)"<rscano@iwa-italy.org> > Cc: "gv@trace.wisc.edu"<gv@trace.wisc.edu>, "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org"<w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> > Oggetto: Re: R: Congratulations !! > > Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) wrote: > > > > > Maurizio Boscarol sent a Friday, November 25, 2005 7:03 AM message with > > the topic "Re: R: Congratulations !!"; > > > > "We are doing technical requirements for products or processes, not > > laws. Sad, but someone can't see the difference." > > > >Roberto: > >Yes, but don't cry like a crocodile if nobody apply wcag "as is" for national law. > >I want to remember that one of the scope for what WAI was financed by EU was to have appicable standards. > > > > Are you pulling my leg? Admit it!.. Well, or you misunderstood me. > > To be clear: I *never* wanted wcag be a law. You want, not me! :) I > >Roberto: >No Me, but wai > > I don't know if this is true, but my points hold anyway, of course. There's a strong difference between law and standard, for the reason I already pointed out. With this are you saying that you personally don't want the wcag be a law? So I misunderstood you for all these years? ;-) Can you confirm? You don't want wcag be a law?... ;-) It would be a good new. :) M
Received on Friday, 25 November 2005 16:53:01 UTC