- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 14:44:47 -0600
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <011601c5ebb7$bff2a560$ee8cfea9@NC6000BAK>
The following appears to be editorial (wording) but it is to a success criterion so I am posting to the list WAS Non-emergency interruptions, such as updated content, can be postponed or suppressed by the user. non-emergency interruption : an interruption that is not a sudden, unexpected situation or occurrence that requires immediate action to preserve health, safety or property NEW PROPOSED (From F2F but no recorded resolution) <proposed>The user can postpone or suppress all interruptions, except those involving emergencies.</proposed> rationale: gets us out of using "non-emergency" in SC so we can define "emergency" instead Gregg ------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Depts of Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison < <http://trace.wisc.edu/> http://trace.wisc.edu/> FAX 608/262-8848 For a list of our list discussions http://trace.wisc.edu/lists/ <http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/>
Received on Thursday, 17 November 2005 20:44:59 UTC