- From: Christophe Strobbe <Christophe.Strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
- Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 17:35:41 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
At 01:11 13/11/2005, Sofia Celic wrote:
<blockquote>
Does anyone have a full version of the IRC log from the November 10
teleconference? The log available from the W3C website
(http://www.w3.org/2005/11/10-wai-wcag-irc.html) does not cover the whole
time period.
<blockquote>
I extracted the resolutions and action items out of my IRC client's log
file. I hope I did not miss anything. (I don't have a Perl installation to
run the scribe.pl script.)
Resolutions
Resolution: accept definition of parsing as follows: "Parsing transforms
markup or other code into a data structure, usually a tree, which is
suitable for later processing and which captures the implied hierarchy of
the input. Parsing unambiguously means that there is only one data
structure that can result."
Resolution: adopt wording for 4.1 L1 SC1 "Delivery units can be parsed
unambiguously." for the next draft.
Resolution: have a sufficient technique for 1.4 L2 SC1 and L3 SC1 not
specifying background color and not specififying text color AND delete the
sufficient technique of having no background specified 1.4 L2 SC1 and L3 SC1
Resolution: delete the word "minimum" from L2 SC1 and L3 SC1 of GL 1.4
Resolution: accept GL 1.4 L2 SC1 and L3 SC1 and their guide docs
Resolution: add sufficient technique for GL 2.3 L1 SC1 and L2 SC2 -
Providing a means to disable or turn off the provocative information before
encountering it
Resolution: change GL 2.3 L1 SC1 to "When content violates either the
general flash threshold or the red flash threshold, users are warned in a
way that they can avoid it.
Resolution: Modify last resolution - do not add sufficient technique to GL
2.3 L2 SC1 - Providing a means to disable or turn off the provocative
information before encountering it.
Resolution: modify "general flash threshold" and "red flash threshold"
definitions change "is not permitted when" to "where"
Resolution: adopt John's suggestions for edits to intent section.
Resolution: Modify GL 2.3 L2 SC1 sufficient technique to remove reference
to Trace tool. Replace with "Content has been tested and does not violate
general flash threshold or red flash threshold (See reources for tools)"
and move reference to Trace tools to resources.
Resolution: adopt GL 2.3 L1 SC 1 and L2 SC 1 and their guide docs as
modified by resolutions.
Resolution: modify GL 2.4 L2 SC1 to "More than one way is available to
locate content within a set of delivery units where content is not the
result of, or a step in, a process or task."
Resolution: adopt GL 2.4 L2 SC1 and it's guide as amended by resolutions.
Resolution: adopt proposed language for GL 2.4 L2 SC4 with an ed note that
describes the question group has with regard to what "associated" means and
how tight the association has to be. "Each programmatic referece to another
delivery unit or to another location in the same delivery unit is
associated with text describing the destination."
Resolution: adopt GL 2.4 L2 SC4 and it's guide doc as amended by resolutions.
Resolution: Keep GL 1.3 L1 SC2 and L2 SC2 as is (undoing previous
resolution to change L1 SC2 text) and add an editoral note to L1 SC2 that
says, "The Working group is considering moving L2 SC2 to Level 1 and
combining it with L1 SC2 so that information conveyed through color is
available visually without color and also available programatically."
Resolution: accept the sc and guide doc as edited "Navigational features
within the content can be programmatically determined." and Adopt alternate
definition from the F2F . 2.4 L1 SC1
Resolution: unanimous consent the wording of GL L SC1 changed to read
"perceivable structures within the content can be programmatically determined."
Resolution: accept guide doc as edited, GL 1.3 L1 SC1
Resolution: adopt Christophe's edit to 1.3 L3 SC2 "Information required to
understand and operate content does not rely solely on shape, size, visual
location or orientation of components."
Resolution: adopt 1.3 L3 SC2 guide doc as edited
Resolution: change "determined programatically" to "programatically
determined" 1.3 L3 SC1
Resolution: accept Guide doc for 1.3 L3 SC1 as edited
Resolution: adopt guide doc as edited GL 3.1 L 3 SC 1 (restricted
words-unusual words)
Resolution: adopt edited guide doc for 4.2 L1 SC2
Resolution: * The content and properties of user interface elements
that can be changed via the user interface can also be directly changed
programmatically.
NOTE: Some examples of standardized properties that
typically can be changed by the user interface include its value, whether
it is currently selected, and whether it currently has the focus.
Resolution: adopt the wording for SC 4.2 L1 SC 5 "The content and
properties of user interface elements that can be changed via the user
interface can also be directly changed programmatically. " with the
ednote:NOTE: Some examples of standardized properties that typically can be
changed by the user interface include its value, whether it is currently
selected, and whether it currently has the focus.
Resolution: adopt the proposed rewording to conformance section to relect
that baseline is what is requied and relied is optional
Resolution: ednote: the working group is developing language to distinguish
between web content and downloaded files which is not content...
Resolution: The Working Group is developing language to differentiate
between Web content on the one hand and downloaded software and other
non-Web content on the other.
Resolution: unanimous. to authorize the editors to make any additional
cleanup needed to prepare the document with notification to the working
group of any non-editorial changes
Action items
Action: Gregg will work with Yvette and Makoto, Christophe to find an
easier way say "Luminosity" in 1.4 L2 SC1
Action: Gregg will see if he can add text to the intent of 1.4 L2 SC1 to
give background on the definition of luminosity
Action: Gregg - add benefits to GL 2.3 L1 SC1
Action: Tim to propose GL 2.3 SC that addresses provision of alternative
equivalent content.
Action: Tim to look at GL 4.2 to see if the issue is covered there
Action: Gian continue action item to find techniques that do not require
specific technologies not commonly in the baseline to implement.
Scribes: David, Andi, Becky
Attendees:
Wendy Chisholm, David MacDonald, Christophe Strobbe, John Slatin, Yvette
Hoitink, Gregg Vanderheiden, Ben Caldwell, Michael Cooper, Makoto Ueki,
Andi Snow-Weaver, Gez Lemon, Bengt Farre, Alex Li, Sofia Celic, Don Evans,
Becky Gibson, Loretta Guarino Reid, Gian Sampson-Wild, Diana Stottlemeyer,
Katie Haritos-Shea, Tim Boland, Judy Brewer
This was a long call (9 p.m. - 6 a.m. in my timezone, CET) and many people
attended the whole call.
Regards,
Christophe Strobbe
--
--
Christophe Strobbe
K.U.Leuven - Departement of Electrical Engineering - Research Group on
Document Architectures
Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - 3001 Leuven-Heverlee - BELGIUM
tel: +32 16 32 85 51
http://www.docarch.be/
Received on Sunday, 13 November 2005 16:37:12 UTC