- From: Christophe Strobbe <Christophe.Strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
- Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 17:35:41 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
At 01:11 13/11/2005, Sofia Celic wrote: <blockquote> Does anyone have a full version of the IRC log from the November 10 teleconference? The log available from the W3C website (http://www.w3.org/2005/11/10-wai-wcag-irc.html) does not cover the whole time period. <blockquote> I extracted the resolutions and action items out of my IRC client's log file. I hope I did not miss anything. (I don't have a Perl installation to run the scribe.pl script.) Resolutions Resolution: accept definition of parsing as follows: "Parsing transforms markup or other code into a data structure, usually a tree, which is suitable for later processing and which captures the implied hierarchy of the input. Parsing unambiguously means that there is only one data structure that can result." Resolution: adopt wording for 4.1 L1 SC1 "Delivery units can be parsed unambiguously." for the next draft. Resolution: have a sufficient technique for 1.4 L2 SC1 and L3 SC1 not specifying background color and not specififying text color AND delete the sufficient technique of having no background specified 1.4 L2 SC1 and L3 SC1 Resolution: delete the word "minimum" from L2 SC1 and L3 SC1 of GL 1.4 Resolution: accept GL 1.4 L2 SC1 and L3 SC1 and their guide docs Resolution: add sufficient technique for GL 2.3 L1 SC1 and L2 SC2 - Providing a means to disable or turn off the provocative information before encountering it Resolution: change GL 2.3 L1 SC1 to "When content violates either the general flash threshold or the red flash threshold, users are warned in a way that they can avoid it. Resolution: Modify last resolution - do not add sufficient technique to GL 2.3 L2 SC1 - Providing a means to disable or turn off the provocative information before encountering it. Resolution: modify "general flash threshold" and "red flash threshold" definitions change "is not permitted when" to "where" Resolution: adopt John's suggestions for edits to intent section. Resolution: Modify GL 2.3 L2 SC1 sufficient technique to remove reference to Trace tool. Replace with "Content has been tested and does not violate general flash threshold or red flash threshold (See reources for tools)" and move reference to Trace tools to resources. Resolution: adopt GL 2.3 L1 SC 1 and L2 SC 1 and their guide docs as modified by resolutions. Resolution: modify GL 2.4 L2 SC1 to "More than one way is available to locate content within a set of delivery units where content is not the result of, or a step in, a process or task." Resolution: adopt GL 2.4 L2 SC1 and it's guide as amended by resolutions. Resolution: adopt proposed language for GL 2.4 L2 SC4 with an ed note that describes the question group has with regard to what "associated" means and how tight the association has to be. "Each programmatic referece to another delivery unit or to another location in the same delivery unit is associated with text describing the destination." Resolution: adopt GL 2.4 L2 SC4 and it's guide doc as amended by resolutions. Resolution: Keep GL 1.3 L1 SC2 and L2 SC2 as is (undoing previous resolution to change L1 SC2 text) and add an editoral note to L1 SC2 that says, "The Working group is considering moving L2 SC2 to Level 1 and combining it with L1 SC2 so that information conveyed through color is available visually without color and also available programatically." Resolution: accept the sc and guide doc as edited "Navigational features within the content can be programmatically determined." and Adopt alternate definition from the F2F . 2.4 L1 SC1 Resolution: unanimous consent the wording of GL L SC1 changed to read "perceivable structures within the content can be programmatically determined." Resolution: accept guide doc as edited, GL 1.3 L1 SC1 Resolution: adopt Christophe's edit to 1.3 L3 SC2 "Information required to understand and operate content does not rely solely on shape, size, visual location or orientation of components." Resolution: adopt 1.3 L3 SC2 guide doc as edited Resolution: change "determined programatically" to "programatically determined" 1.3 L3 SC1 Resolution: accept Guide doc for 1.3 L3 SC1 as edited Resolution: adopt guide doc as edited GL 3.1 L 3 SC 1 (restricted words-unusual words) Resolution: adopt edited guide doc for 4.2 L1 SC2 Resolution: * The content and properties of user interface elements that can be changed via the user interface can also be directly changed programmatically. NOTE: Some examples of standardized properties that typically can be changed by the user interface include its value, whether it is currently selected, and whether it currently has the focus. Resolution: adopt the wording for SC 4.2 L1 SC 5 "The content and properties of user interface elements that can be changed via the user interface can also be directly changed programmatically. " with the ednote:NOTE: Some examples of standardized properties that typically can be changed by the user interface include its value, whether it is currently selected, and whether it currently has the focus. Resolution: adopt the proposed rewording to conformance section to relect that baseline is what is requied and relied is optional Resolution: ednote: the working group is developing language to distinguish between web content and downloaded files which is not content... Resolution: The Working Group is developing language to differentiate between Web content on the one hand and downloaded software and other non-Web content on the other. Resolution: unanimous. to authorize the editors to make any additional cleanup needed to prepare the document with notification to the working group of any non-editorial changes Action items Action: Gregg will work with Yvette and Makoto, Christophe to find an easier way say "Luminosity" in 1.4 L2 SC1 Action: Gregg will see if he can add text to the intent of 1.4 L2 SC1 to give background on the definition of luminosity Action: Gregg - add benefits to GL 2.3 L1 SC1 Action: Tim to propose GL 2.3 SC that addresses provision of alternative equivalent content. Action: Tim to look at GL 4.2 to see if the issue is covered there Action: Gian continue action item to find techniques that do not require specific technologies not commonly in the baseline to implement. Scribes: David, Andi, Becky Attendees: Wendy Chisholm, David MacDonald, Christophe Strobbe, John Slatin, Yvette Hoitink, Gregg Vanderheiden, Ben Caldwell, Michael Cooper, Makoto Ueki, Andi Snow-Weaver, Gez Lemon, Bengt Farre, Alex Li, Sofia Celic, Don Evans, Becky Gibson, Loretta Guarino Reid, Gian Sampson-Wild, Diana Stottlemeyer, Katie Haritos-Shea, Tim Boland, Judy Brewer This was a long call (9 p.m. - 6 a.m. in my timezone, CET) and many people attended the whole call. Regards, Christophe Strobbe -- -- Christophe Strobbe K.U.Leuven - Departement of Electrical Engineering - Research Group on Document Architectures Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - 3001 Leuven-Heverlee - BELGIUM tel: +32 16 32 85 51 http://www.docarch.be/
Received on Sunday, 13 November 2005 16:37:12 UTC