- From: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpatrick@macromedia.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 07:00:47 -0800
- To: "Maurizio Boscarol" <maurizio@usabile.it>, "Bailey, Bruce" <Bruce.Bailey@ed.gov>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> >No one has objected to Yvette's observation that validity is > necessary but not sufficient. > > > I objected! Maybe someone missed it. I object that validity is > necessary: we altready agree that it isn't. Validation (as a > check) is useful. There have been several objections Yvette's observation, some of which preceded the observation. I agree that pursuing validity simplifies the process of making an accessible site, but you might endeavor to make a valid web page and not completely succeed (for any number of small reasons) and still realize all of the process benefits that tend to drive the production process closer to an accessible site. AWK
Received on Thursday, 10 November 2005 15:01:28 UTC