- From: Lisa Seeman <lisa@ubaccess.com>
- Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 13:24:12 +0200
- To: Lisa Seeman <lisa@ubaccess.com>, Yvette Hoitink <y.p.hoitink@heritas.nl>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
----- Original Message ----- From: "Lisa Seeman" <lisa@ubaccess.com> To: "Yvette Hoitink" <y.p.hoitink@heritas.nl>; <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 5:26 AM Subject: Re: Validity as a technique > >> I propose to delete the requirement for validity from our guidelines and >> instead list it as a necessary but not sufficient technique for all the >> success criteria that require something can be 'programmatically >> determined'. I think this would solve many of the problems: > > > I don't think this will work because the whole document needs to be > machine parse - able and hence valid, not just specific sections of the > document. > > On the other hand techniques tend to refer to sections of content that > have a specific element or type of content. Adding validation to > techniques will blur the need of full document validation. > > All the best > Lisa > >
Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2005 11:35:49 UTC