- From: Matt May <mcmay@bestkungfu.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:30:40 -0800
- To: "Bailey, Bruce" <Bruce.Bailey@ed.gov>
- Cc: "Yvette Hoitink" <y.p.hoitink@heritas.nl>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2005 01:30:49 UTC
On Nov 7, 2005, at 4:38 PM, Bailey, Bruce wrote: > > In my proposal, we wouldn't need to address validity at all in our > > guidelines and view validity as a technique to ensure the other > > accessibility requirements can be met. As such I propose to delete > > them from the guidelines (all levels) and only talk about > techniques. > > Great! The omission of an explicit reference to validity in WCAG2 > SC is one of the compromises I have offered as being acceptable to > the “don’t compromise the importance of validity” faction. Omitting HTML validity at the guideline level would be acceptable to me. I think the language already in the guidelines document is sufficient guidance. - m
Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2005 01:30:49 UTC