- From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
- Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:44:22 +0100
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
-----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Yvette Hoitink Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 8:32 PM To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: RE: Validity as a technique Did you understand my proposal? I agree with you that validity is a great factor in making sure things can be programmatically determined which is why I want to include it in the techniques for all these success criteria. I don't see why it is necessary to put it in the guidelines as well. Roberto Scano: Yes I've understand. But what about in the case of elements that are no part of DTD (the "<embed> case")? Are we sure that all the other guidelines don't require directly/indirectly validity? IMHO if a factor is repetitive, is best to have a guideline.
Received on Monday, 7 November 2005 19:44:35 UTC