RE: Validity as a technique

Gregg wrote:

> 
> I think you missed the thread.
> 
> I think her suggestion was that 4.1 was not necessary if 
> validity was already required in other places - at least to 
> the extent that it was needed for programmatically determining things.
> 
> Maybe I misunderstood her.
> 
> Yvette - did I get this right or were you saying something else. 

Yep. I proposed to delete the requirement for validity from the guidelines
and instead list it as a technique for the success criteria that deal with
things that can be programmatically determined.

Yvette Hoitink
Heritas, Enschede, the Netherlands
E-mail: y.p.hoitink@heritas.nl
WWW: http://www.heritas.nl 

Received on Monday, 7 November 2005 18:47:49 UTC