- From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
- Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:36:40 +0100
- To: "'Gregg Vanderheiden'" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, "'Yvette Hoitink'" <y.p.hoitink@heritas.nl>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
-----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Gregg Vanderheiden Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 4:51 PM To: 'Yvette Hoitink'; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: RE: Validity as a technique Several people have made this point - and it seems to indicate that validity testing would be a very good tool to use in achieving the goal of 'programmatically determined'. Roberto Scano: Yes, this is the point. If we talk about "programmatically determinated", validity is important both for text/html and application/xhtml+xml. IMHO is clear that IWA/HWG is against GL 4.1 removal.
Received on Monday, 7 November 2005 16:37:12 UTC