- From: Matt May <mcmay@bestkungfu.com>
- Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 19:38:48 -0800
- To: Bruce Bailey <Bruce.Bailey@ed.gov>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Received on Sunday, 6 November 2005 03:38:59 UTC
On Nov 5, 2005, at 7:07 PM, Bailey, Bruce wrote: > I recognize that were validity to become a requirement overnight > (which it could, I suppose, in some places) it will cause > significant discomfort to the likes of Matt May and Bob Regan. I strongly object to and am personally offended by this statement. I must point out that my position on this has not changed since I was working for W3C, an organization which, if I remember correctly, had something or other to do with validity and accessibility. Further, if anything, my position is counter to my own interests. It is in my best interest as a skilled author of HTML (and part-owner of a company which sells these services) for WCAG 2 to have a minimum requirement of validity, because I am one of very few developers who is capable of reliably achieving that standard. I maintain this position because of my awareness through the time I spent working on standards and interacting with various segments of my own field that a large majority of people wouldn't have the first clue how to create valid content. - m
Received on Sunday, 6 November 2005 03:38:59 UTC