- From: Livio Mondini <livio.mondini@tiuvizeta.it>
- Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 16:51:42 +0100
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
2005/11/5, Maurizio Boscarol <maurizio@usabile.it>: > If a page isn't rendered, than it wouldn't pass any guideline... you > don't need a specific validation guideline: the system simply doesn't > work at all! And, according to principle 1, the content is NOT > perceivable: failed! It's so simple. (1) Is simple? No, is wrong. This page is rendered and assistive technology work properly, but only in a browser on one operating system, or maybe in a particular version of a browser. This is the problem, not principle 1. Principle is universal, i think, not version related. Your suggestion is version related. > Validation is just a different topic from accessibility, sometimes > related and sometimes not (and related doesn't mean "it's the same"!). Sure, why this declaration? is an element, sure. For you is the same? or someone has said this??? > We need to address only validation problems that cause problems to > accessibility: and obviously we should do this by covering them with all > the other guidelines. A list of problems for all browser, all operating system, all device and relative combinations? Sure? This is your solution? > That said, validation can be a useful way for developers to check their > work, but not a legal criterium to check accessibility, Validation is 1 criterium on 22, not the only. Only you think on that. Livio
Received on Saturday, 5 November 2005 15:53:28 UTC