Re: Summary of arguements FOR validity -- and another against -- and a third of alternatives

One of the points in the FOR section has a typo - it should read:

* People get prosecuted because they fail to consider others, *not*
for having invalid content

Apologies

Gez

--
_____________________________
Supplement your vitamins
http://juicystudio.com

Received on Saturday, 5 November 2005 01:42:38 UTC