- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 15:50:24 -0600
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <00e501c5e189$c34a9020$ee8cfea9@NC6000BAK>
This discussion is moving from productive to circular to destructive - including starting to talk about other people and posters - which is strictly off limits. Cut it out. This mail list is to provide information to the working group. - Putting information here is very useful. - Reposting the same information is not. - Stating personal opinions is not. - Sending a post to just say that you agree with someone is not. We are not voting on the list and it adds no new information for the group to consider. The group does not make decisions based on the number of times the same argument is made by the same person or by another person. And if the working group needs to know the number of people who hold an opinion it needs to look further than just this list. The group makes decisions based on the facts and the arguments or ideas presented. Number is not the key - but the facts or arguments themselves. I have been gathering arguments and will post something as soon as I can summarizing them and making sure that I have them all. In the summary there may be more arguments on one side or the other. But the number of arguments won't be the deciding factor either. I have seen times when there were 10 reasons for one choice and two for the other but one of the two was compelling enough to make the decision. So please - do not keep restating the same arguments without new facts. Please do not say "me too" if there is not new information to add. Please do not start questioning the group's motivations or morals...nor questioning the motivations or morals of members of the list. If you don't agree then don't. If you have a counter argument (that has not already been made) then make it. Don't throw stones Have some faith in the working group or don't have any faith. That is up to you. If you feel the working group or its leadership is biased or inappropriate - file a comment with W3C. The place to start it Judy Brewer. jbrewer@w3.org But this list is not for that kind of thing. It is here to make sure the working group has as much good information as it can to assist it in its deliberations. SHORT SUCCINCT posts are the most helpful, the most read, the easiest to capture and understand. If you must write a long one - please start it with a short summary. Sometimes I read a post 3 times and am not sure the point that the author is trying to make (or sometimes even which side of the question they are arguing). Thanks everyone. This is hard stuff. There are few clear cut issues. And no easy answers. Gregg ------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Depts of Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison < <http://trace.wisc.edu/> http://trace.wisc.edu/> FAX 608/262-8848 For a list of our list discussions http://trace.wisc.edu/lists/ <http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/>
Received on Friday, 4 November 2005 21:50:33 UTC