- From: Jens Meiert <jens.meiert@erde3.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 10:27:36 +0100 (MET)
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
> I agree whit Roberto and Gez. Dito. No offense meant, but this issue is ridiculous, isn't it? Not including validity undermines the WCAG (how is something supposed to be automatically testable without required validity) as well as the W3C (by disrespecting other key specifications), and it generally sets the wrong signal. Is there really /any/ advantage of not including it? Stating that there are user-agents where you can actually improve (!?) accessibility by invalid markup is like stating that you can cross the city faster by ignoring all red traffic lights. To set the right signal, validity should be included, as a Level 1 criterion. -- Jens Meiert Information Architect http://meiert.com/
Received on Friday, 4 November 2005 09:27:47 UTC