- From: Wendy Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 17:28:11 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Available at: <http://www.w3.org/2005/10/06-wai-wcag-minutes.html> [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ WCAG WG 6 Oct 2005 [2]Agenda [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2005OctDec/0003.html See also: [3]IRC log [3] http://www.w3.org/2005/10/06-wai-wcag-irc Attendees Present Gregg Vanderheiden, Ben Caldwell, Alex_Li, Loretta_Guarino_Reid, Wendy Chisholm , Roberto_Ellero, Sofia_Celic, Tim_Boland, Bengt_Farre, Katie_Haritos-Shea, Gian_Sampson-Wild, David_MacDonald, Don_Evans, Becky_Gibson (partial), Andi Snow-Weaver (partial) Regrets Roberto_Castaldo, John_Slatin, Sebastiano_Nutarelli, Bruno_von_Niman, WATANABE_Takayuki, Michael_Cooper, Luca_Mascaro, Christophe_Strobbe Chair Gregg Scribe wendy Contents * [4]Topics 1. [5]Check-in and assignements for next guidelines (15 minutes) 2. [6]Team C: proposals, questions and updates (20 minutes) 3. [7]Team B: proposals, questions and updates: (20 minutes) 4. [8]Team A: proposals, questions and updates (20 minutes) survey results - http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/20051004survey/results * [9]Summary of Action Items _________________________________________________________________ Check-in and assignements for next guidelines (15 minutes) team c - 1.3 (as well as 4.2 and 2.5) team b - 2.4 (as well as 1.2 and 3.1) team a - 2.2 (as well as 1.1 and 3.2) gv and bc are doing 2.3, 2.1, and 1.4 editors are doing 4.1 then have all of them worked for f2f plan is to go into f2f with drafts of everything and come out with a WD Team C: proposals, questions and updates (20 minutes) should have 2.5 guide documents for next week 1.3 has some guide document already - [10]http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-GENERAL/guideline1.3.html [10] http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-GENERAL/guideline1.3.html [11]http://trace.wisc.edu/wcag_wiki/ - there is not yet an entry for 1.3, but anyone can create (ask ben or wendy for instructions) [11] http://trace.wisc.edu/wcag_wiki/ face-to-face agenda: day 1 - 5 guidelines, day 2 - 5 guidelines, day 3 - 3 guidelines, conformance, checklist, day 4 - JIS, what's left, prep for november WD also, mapping - updates as needed (to publish as appendix) Team B: proposals, questions and updates: (20 minutes) 3.1 in good shape, 1.2 under way, 2.4 will need to alert the team Team A: proposals, questions and updates (20 minutes) survey results - [12]http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/20051004survey/results [12] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/20051004survey/results Issue 1488 Should L3 SC1 be removed? concern about tools to generate collated transcripts resolution: captions + audio descriptions would constitute a sufficient solution no one supports moving this from level 3 to level 2 (even though is priority 1 in WCAG 1.0, as part of checkpoint 1.1) unclear that audio description is part of transcript as worded, "For prerecorded multimedia content, a combined transcript of captions and audio descriptions of video is available." we mean "collated transcript" but were trying to avoid that phrase <scribe> ACTION: gian propose rewrite of guideline 1.1 L3 sc 1 [recorded in [13]http://www.w3.org/2005/10/06-wai-wcag-minutes.html#action01] resolution: reword but don't remove 1.1 l3 sc1 Revise example 2 and close issue 1561 concern that short label should provide the info that could be easily gleaned from a quick glance at the bar chart concern about use of word "label" - a very charged word use text alternative instead a short text alternative says...a longer description... resolution: Example 2: a data chart. A bar chart compares how many widgets were sold in June, July, and August. A short text alternative says, "Figure one - Bar chart of sales in June, July and August." A longer description identifies the type of chart, provides a high-level summary of the data comparable to that available from the chart, and provides the data in a table close issue 1561 resolution: Example 8: a traffic Web camera. A Web site allows end-users to select from a variety of Web cameras positioned throughout a major city to monitor traffic conditions. After a camera is selected, the image updates every 2 minutes. A short text alternative identifies the Web camera as, "Web camera view of traffic conditions at the corner of University and Park." The site also... ... provides a table of travel times for each of the routes covered by the Web cameras. The table information can be updated on request. then close issue 1562 resolution: Close issue 1698 Issue 1703 resolution: close issue 1703 issue 895 resolution: close issue 895 feedback on Guide to Guideline 3.2 Level 1 Success Criterion 1 and guides for 3.2 Level 3 Success Criterion 1 and Guideline 3.2 Level 3 Success Criterion 2 - team a will take that feedback back to the group. Summary of Action Items [NEW] ACTION: gian propose rewrite of guideline 1.1 L3 sc 1 [recorded in [14]http://www.w3.org/2005/10/06-wai-wcag-minutes.html#action01] [End of minutes] _________________________________________________________________ Minutes formatted by David Booth's [15]scribe.perl version 1.127 ([16]CVS log) $Date: 2005/10/06 21:23:07 $ [15] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm [16] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/ _________________________________________________________________
Received on Thursday, 6 October 2005 21:28:33 UTC