- From: Jens Meiert <jens.meiert@erde3.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 17:03:12 +0200 (MEST)
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
> I think these count images are examples of images not used to convey > information. The non-disabled user does not perceive these pixels, so > neither should a person with a disability. > > Personally, I think alt="" is a good solution for this. Why do you think > that is suboptimal? Because there are user-agents indicating that there just is an image (which we know might be frustrating). Ah, most interesting is that automated test tools should address this anyway, too - or am I wrong remembering tools which ever and ever again criticize empty "alt" attributes? Hmm. -- Jens Meiert Information Architect http://meiert.com/ http://uitest.com/ < Reloaded
Received on Wednesday, 14 September 2005 15:03:28 UTC