- From: Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
- Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 07:55:35 +0200
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
In the note I read:
1. "Create documents that validate to published formal grammars".
2. "Create documents that validate to formal grammars published by W3C (or ISO or some other organization that we like its recommendations)".
Nir Dagan writes: "In my view validity should be a level 1 success criterion", but he views as level 1 only first point: but a violation of formal grammars of W3C / ISO don't violate also point 1?
----- Messaggio originale -----
Da: "bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu"<bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu>
Inviato: 20/08/05 6.52.01
A: "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org"<w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Oggetto: NEW: Issue #1554
[This e-mail has been automatically generated. The following NEW issue was added
to Bugzilla earlier today.]
Responses to "Accessibility and validity" issue/summary
-> http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1554
[Messaggio troncato. Toccare Modifica->Segna per il download per recuperare la restante parte.]
Received on Saturday, 20 August 2005 05:55:58 UTC