- From: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
- Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 09:58:23 -0500
- To: "Bob Regan" <bregan@macromedia.com>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Cc: <rscano@iwa-italy.org>, "Andrew Kirkpatrick" <akirkpatrick@macromedia.com>
- Message-ID: <6EED8F7006A883459D4818686BCE3B3B01B0628D@MAIL01.austin.utexas.edu>
Bob Regan asks: <blockquote> Let's present the question directly to the group. It is relevant. Can a non-W3 technology meet WCAG? Can a proprietary technology meet WCAG? I have long been under the assumption that the answer is yes, it can. If the definition of accessibility has changed, then we should get that out in the open. </blockquote> The 30 June 2005 Public Working Draft of WCAG 2.0, available at http://www.w3.org/tr/wcag20, states explicitly that content created with non-W3C technologies *can* conform: <blockquote> Technology assumptions and the "baseline" WCAG 2.0 defines accessibility guidelines and success criteria as functional outcomes. These outcomes are described in a technology independent way in order to allow conformance using any Web technology that supports accessibility. WCAG 2.0 therefore does not require or prohibit the use of any specific technology. It is possible to conform to WCAG 2.0 using both W3C and non-W3C technologies, as long as they are supported by accessible user agents. </blockquote> John "Good design is accessible design." Dr. John M. Slatin, Director Accessibility Institute University of Texas at Austin FAC 248C 1 University Station G9600 Austin, TX 78712 ph 512-495-4288, fax 512-495-4524 email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu Web <http://www.ital.utexas.edu/> http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Bob Regan Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2005 1:56 PM To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Cc: rscano@iwa-italy.org; Andrew Kirkpatrick Subject: RE: RE: R: NEW: Issue #1544 Roberto, Flash in this context can be thought of as the presentation layer. If the user does not have the required user agents, then a text equivalent can be delivered. I would add that this is the very same strategy used by W3 technologies such CSS and SVG. Further, to my knowledge, there are no configurations of user agents that directly render SVG. Let's present the question directly to the group. It is relevant. Can a non-W3 technology meet WCAG? Can a proprietary technology meet WCAG? I have long been under the assumption that the answer is yes, it can. If the definition of accessibility has changed, then we should get that out in the open. Cheers, Bob ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - bob regan | macromedia | 415.832.5305
Received on Monday, 15 August 2005 14:58:35 UTC