- From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 11:01:04 +0200
- To: "'Johannes Koch'" <koch@w3development.de>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
-----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Johannes Koch Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 10:16 AM To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: Re: NEW: Issue #1544 Your specification located here (http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-WCAG20-SCRIPT-TECHS-20041119/) advocates using a non W3C standard event named "onactivate". This is an Microsoft only event and should not be promoted as part of a WC3 specification document candidate. Roberto Scano: Agree. We need to remove also HTML techniques for <embed> (Netscape Tag): http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-HTML-TECHS/#noembed I see different "weight" for different proprietary tags: http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-HTML-TECHS/#marquee http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-HTML-TECHS/#blink Here is clear that Do not use the marquee element to create scrolling text. There are several reasons for this: [...] The xxxxx element is not part of the HTML specification. Why a privilege for embed?
Received on Thursday, 11 August 2005 09:01:18 UTC