- From: <lguarino@adobe.com>
- Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 11:20:57 -0700
- To: Gez Lemon <gez.lemon@gmail.com>
- Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
> As I believe that validity is important for > accessibility, I believe the results from the markup validator belong > in the results. Obviously, anyone who doesn't believe that validity is > important for accessibility can just discard the markup validator > results. Gez, even if validity is important for accessibility, it is still weaker than accessibility. Accessibility puts more constraints on the author than just validity. So comparing a validity checker to an accessibility checker is still apples and oranges. Especially when your point is that the automatic checkers are missing accessibility problems. Loretta
Received on Tuesday, 9 August 2005 18:21:12 UTC