- From: David Poehlman <david.poehlman@handsontechnologeyes.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 21:21:16 -0400
- To: Joe Clark <joeclark@joeclark.org>
- Cc: WAI-IG <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>, WAI-GL <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
In his follow up, perhaps he could use the tools as they are intended
to be used.
--
Jonnie Apple Seed
With His:
Hands-On Technolog(eye)s
On Aug 8, 2005, at 3:13 PM, Joe Clark wrote:
National treasure Gez Lemon wrote a test page with known validation
and WCAG errors and ran it through various automated checking tools,
none of which caught more than a few of the errors, if that.
<http://juicystudio.com/article/invalid-content-accessibility-
validators.php>
It's quite a devastating analysis and calls into question the WCAG
Working Group's interest in making as many guidelines as possible
machine-checkable.
He'll have a follow-up next week.
--
Joe Clark | joeclark@joeclark.org
Accessibility <http://joeclark.org/access/>
Expect criticism if you top-post
Received on Tuesday, 9 August 2005 01:21:30 UTC