Re: Words in place of optional

At 04:35 AM 8/1/2005, Lisa Seeman wrote:
>Chris Ridpath wrote:
>
>>Just use the 3 levels. There's no need for the confusing category of 
>>"optional".
>
>
>Thanks Chris
>
>That is the point I was trying to make.

The levels are related to conformance.  Techniques are informative -- not 
required for conformance -- therefore I don't think we can use the levels 
to describe techniques.

--wendy 

Received on Monday, 8 August 2005 20:24:04 UTC