- From: Lisa Seeman <lisa@ubaccess.com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 18:54:19 +0200
- To: Joe Clark <joeclark@joeclark.org>
- CC: WAI-GL <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> > Which (X)HTML elements *in use today* would unambiguously provide that > programmatic determination? (Do not respond that WCAG2 must be > technology-neutral; if you can't make a guideline work today, your > guideline *doesn't work*.) > <em> tag would do it Simple and easy >> Issue 4: Re: A mechanism is available for identifying specific >> definitions of words used in an unusual or restricted way, including >> idioms and jargon. [I] >> >> Lisa: I would add the word confusing so that it reads "words used in an >> unusual, confusing or restricted way" > > > Guidelines requiring definitions must be eliminated. They aren't the > author's responsibility. You got a problem with a word, *you* look it up. > I do not understand this - text can be confusing without being used in an unusual or restricted way. I wanted to include the extra case of confusing. Best Lisa
Received on Wednesday, 3 August 2005 15:55:41 UTC