Re: [techs] What makes a good test?


At 17:52 1/08/2005, Tim Boland wrote:
>This is a resource for consideration in the current test case reviews.
>According to Question #7 of TestFAQ [1]:
>A good test is:
>2       Atomic (tests a single feature rather than multiple features)

There is nothing wrong with a test that tests multiple features; atomic tests
simply have a higher priority. A test suite with "complex tests" would be huge,
but that does not make those tests "bad".

>Thanks and best wishes
>Tim Boland NIST


Christophe Strobbe


Christophe Strobbe
K.U.Leuven - Departement of Electrical Engineering - Research Group on 
Document Architectures
Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - 3001 Leuven-Heverlee - BELGIUM
tel: +32 16 32 85 51 

Received on Monday, 1 August 2005 17:57:58 UTC