- From: Christophe Strobbe <christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
- Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 19:56:28 +0200
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Hi, At 17:52 1/08/2005, Tim Boland wrote: >This is a resource for consideration in the current test case reviews. >According to Question #7 of TestFAQ [1]: > ><quote> >A good test is: > >(...) >2 Atomic (tests a single feature rather than multiple features) There is nothing wrong with a test that tests multiple features; atomic tests simply have a higher priority. A test suite with "complex tests" would be huge, but that does not make those tests "bad". >(...) ></quote> > >Thanks and best wishes >Tim Boland NIST Regards, Christophe Strobbe >(...) >[1]: http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2005/01/test-faq#good -- Christophe Strobbe K.U.Leuven - Departement of Electrical Engineering - Research Group on Document Architectures Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - 3001 Leuven-Heverlee - BELGIUM tel: +32 16 32 85 51 http://www.docarch.be/
Received on Monday, 1 August 2005 17:57:58 UTC