RE: [techs] test case reviews

At 11:53 AM 7/27/2005, Rob Haverty wrote:
>Forgive my ignorance since I am new to this group but I thought the goal
>was to ensure that a test case existed for every guideline.  It seems to
>me that the general test case below "labels should be positioned close
>to the control" should be retained.

We plan to have a technique for each success criterion and each technique 
should have a test case. however, there is no WCAG 2.0 success criterion 
that states "labels should be positioned close to the control."

Currently, we have a deprecated technique but that technique only exists to 
explain that the WCAG 1.0 Checkpoint is no longer necessary.  Instead, 
explicit association between label and control is the appropriate technique.


     [1] <>

Received on Wednesday, 27 July 2005 15:59:43 UTC