- From: Lisa Seeman <lisa@ubaccess.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:11:45 +0200
- To: wai-gl <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I am a bit concerned with using the word optional for techniques that do not map to success criteria. Some techniques are less important and hence can be marked as optional. However a lot of important techniques for the accessibility of the content do not map to success criteria because they are hard to test etc... I think labeling them optional makes important techniques sound unimportant . I would prefer a term such as preferred , encouraged or advanced techniques. All teh best Lisa Seeman
Received on Wednesday, 27 July 2005 15:13:13 UTC