- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 00:17:58 -0500
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Maybe we go with this one and then revisit when we have finalized the category 4 guidelines. Other thoughts? Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Neil Whiteley Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2005 9:55 PM To: 'Gregg Vanderheiden' Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: RE: John's proposed wording for Principle 4 <Gregg> Anyone think of a fix or way to not sound so ....... hard to achieve? (Since we can never really make things so that they will work with all future technologies) </Gregg> How about: 4. Content is able to work with current and developing technologies Neil.
Received on Monday, 18 July 2005 05:20:16 UTC