Guideline 4.1 (was: Re: 14 June 2005 Agenda)

Let me clarify that even if we use the proposal from the F2F in today's 
discussion that does not mean we are heading in that direction by 
default.  The discussion of Guideline 4.1 is very much open, we have 
listened to the feedback from this list and others, and a summary of the 
issues is available at: 

I have been talking with the W3C Team [1] about the issues and am receiving 
interesting feedback that I will summarize after I have a chance to 
follow-up on a few of the discussions.  We have also raised the issue 
within the WAI Coordination Group [2] and expect to follow-up with as many 
experts as possible to feed into the discussion.


[1] <>
[2] <>

At 02:37 PM 7/14/2005, Christophe Strobbe wrote:

>Hi Gregg,
>At 23:25 12/07/2005, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote:
>>2. Harvest techniques and/or tests for guidelines 3.2, 4.1 and 4.2.
>>(Note: Since there are no techniques in guideline 4.1 in the current
>>public draft, we will be working from the success criterion that were
>>proposed in the 13-16 June face to face at
>On 20 June, I sent a new proposal for well-formedness to the list
>( because well-formedness does not apply to
>SGML. (I mentioned the proposal on the 23 June conference call:
>Christophe Strobbe
>Christophe Strobbe
>K.U.Leuven - Departement of Electrical Engineering - Research Group on 
>Document Architectures
>Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - 3001 Leuven-Heverlee - BELGIUM
>tel: +32 16 32 85 51

Received on Thursday, 14 July 2005 18:56:55 UTC