- From: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.its.unimelb.edu.au>
- Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 17:18:42 +1000
- To: <neil.whiteley@tag2.net>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Neil Whiteley writes: > > The technology baseline is impossible to define in a normative way. There > are just too many variables. All that you can do is decide upon (in a "pin > the tail on a donkey" kind of way) and state the baseline used in compiling > the guidelines. I'm going to state a position here: 1. The most that should be required by WCAG 2.0 is that there either exist a UAAG 1.0-conformant implementation of the technologies relied upon by the content; or such repair technqiues be implemented as to compensate for the shortfall of at least one implementation from UAAG 1.0. Informative advice regarding user agent support should be provided in techniques. Widespread availability of implementations is desirable but should not be part of any conformance requirement at least at level 1 and preferably not at all.
Received on Sunday, 27 March 2005 07:19:09 UTC