- From: Ben Caldwell <caldwell@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 14:37:03 -0600
- To: WCAG-WG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <423B3BEF.80404@trace.wisc.edu>
At the Boston Techniques F2F held earlier this month, a few of us (John, Tom, David, Wendy and I) began working through the process of sorting our existing techniques into various categories as a means for working through some of the issues surrounding baseline and in hopes of gaining a better understanding of how technology-specific techniques relate to conformance. The questions we asked about each success criterion were: - what are sufficient techniques? - what techniques work today? - what is the baseline ideal recommendation? (what we'd recommend in a perfect world) - what practices might cause an author to fail? - which techniques are optional? - which techniques are not in spec? (transitional) - which techniques are dependent on baseline decisions? I've attached our notes (which cover all of the HTML techniques currently mapped to guideline 1.1, level 1, success criterion 1). Though the process was somewhat time-consuming, we felt it was helpful to work through the individual techniques in the context of these questions and felt that this process was an important part of collecting the data needed for resolving baseline as well as identifying the improvements needed for future techniques drafts. -Ben -- Ben Caldwell | <caldwell@trace.wisc.edu> Trace Research and Development Center <http://trace.wisc.edu>
Attachments
- text/html attachment: techniques-sorting-notes.htm
Received on Friday, 18 March 2005 20:38:55 UTC