RE: additional note on techniques doc - no use of word "required"

I wasn't thinking of using it in the techniques doc, no. 

 


Gregg

 -- ------------------------------ 
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center 
University of Wisconsin-Madison 

 

 


  _____  


From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of Doyle-Work
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 4:57 PM
To: Gregg Vanderheiden; W3C Web Content
Subject: Re: additional note on techniques doc - no use of word "required"




On 3/10/05 11:21 AM, "Gregg Vanderheiden" <gv@trace.wisc.edu> wrote:

Here is another note to add to description of Techniques Doc in the
Organization of WCAG Docs doc.

o        

*	The word REQUIRED would not be used in the techniques document
anywhere. (otherwise it starts to become normative).  Instead techniques
would refer to the Success Criteria and define techniques that were felt to
be 'sufficient' to meet the SC and thus would be 'Safe Harbor". 


Just a quick note.  Gregg, you are not implying/suggesting that we use the
term, Safe Harbor anywhere in the documents (techniques doc in particular)
are you?  

Doyle

Doyle Burnett
Education and Training Specialist
Multiple Disabilities Program
Special Education Service Agency
dburnett@sesa.org
Www.sesa.org
-- 












Gregg

------------------------

Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
Professor - Depts of Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center 
University of Wisconsin-Madison 
<http://trace.wisc.edu/ <http://trace.wisc.edu/> > FAX 608/262-8848  
For a list of our list discussions http://trace.wisc.edu/lists/

<http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/>