- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:19:05 -0600
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <auto-000219563777@spamarrest.com>
Possible Format for techniques doc? Techniques doc has two sections * Reference Section 1. Organized by Success Criterion 2. With descriptions of implications for different technologies (collapsible) * Application Section 1. Organized by activity (e.g. creating forms, media, etc. ) FORMAT of techniques in REFERENCE section 1. Success Criterion 2. Key words in SC (definition of key words) 3. How SC criterion applies to the Following Technologies * Technology 1 (e.g. HTML) * Technology 2 * (this list may collapse or have members dependent on user saying that they are using or not using particular technology) 4. Advisory Techniques (not needed to conform to SC) * (may be mixed with #3 above but would need to be clearly marked as ADVISORY techniques so they are not confused with those needed to conform to SC) 5. Tests/test-methods to test for completion of the technique * These are links to tests for techniques (both SC related techniques and ADVISORY techniques) 2. FORMAT of techniques in APPLICATION section 1. This is formatted to make it easy to understand how to do things within a particular activity - such as designing online Forms. 2. Should be compatible with REFERENCE section - but would be different
Attachments
- application/msword attachment: Possible_format_for_techniques_Doc.doc
Received on Thursday, 10 March 2005 20:19:09 UTC