- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:21:20 -0600
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <auto-000218978989@spamarrest.com>
Per our discussion about techniques and formatting How do we make it clear what is required and advisory? How to do we link to checklists and SC? A thought on format. Might they look something like this:? General topic title Background and general advice Related Success Criteria SC XXX of LEVEL Z Things that relate to this topic that are Necessary for conformance with this SC (or Checklist items that are related to this topic and this Success Criteria) - Checklist item #1 (declarative form -- eg xxx has been done.) Notes: put any discussion here about doing this. - The next checklist item Notes: about it - Things to consider that give improved access in some cases [ADVISORY ONLY] - additional things that could be done (ing form - as in "using zzz to do yyyy" - next thing to consider (e.g. limiting length of text ) - SC YYY of Level Z Gregg ------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Depts of Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison <http://trace.wisc.edu/> FAX 608/262-8848 For a list of our listserves http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/
Received on Thursday, 10 February 2005 23:21:24 UTC