- From: Alistair Garrison <alistair.garrison@accessinmind.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:24:18 +0100
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <20050210162420.D24F037E6C@smtp3-1-sn1.fre.skanova.net>
Dear All, Over the past weeks I have been undertaking an end-to-end analysis of the WCAG 2.0 Guidelines and Techniques (as far as reasonably possible). The issue I come across most is the fact Technology Specific techniques and General techniques don't seem to line up - leaving me confused about what I need to do for conformance to WCAG 2.0. You can find technology specific techniques which go too far and specify things which should be left to the General techniques i.e. specified values for alt text; or General techniques which are over-extended to talk about technology specific things i.e. captions, mathematical expressions, video. Again, I state that this is causing me a great deal of confusion, and I'm sure others are finding (or will find) the same thing. To my mind, it might be far less confusing to the reader if the guidance provided through the General techniques document was written directly into each technology specific techniques document (i.e. HTML, CSS, etc.) as specific techniques, examples and tests - removing, the need for the General Techniques document entirely. I would be very interested to hear the thoughts and comments of others on this matter. Alistair Alistair Garrison Managing Director Accessinmind Limited UK Filial Tel.: 0046 8 44 65 287 Website: http://www.accessinmind.com IMPORTANT: This e-mail, including any attachments, is for the addressee only. It may contain privileged and/or confidential information. If it has come to you in error, please notify the sender immediately. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy, print, distribute or rely on its contents. All e-mails and any attachments are believed, but not warranted, to be virus free. However, all e-mails should be virus checked before being downloaded and we accept no responsibility therefore.
Received on Thursday, 10 February 2005 16:24:52 UTC