- From: Michael Cooper <michaelc@watchfire.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:56:57 -0500
- To: "WAI WCAG List" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
HI - your explanation makes sense to me, so I withdraw my suggestion here. :) Michael > > Test 54: I almost got confused because while the <title> > > elements represent the issue of not describing the > > document properly, the <h1> elements don't represent > > that issue. Just for clarity it might be useful if the <h1> > > of the "fail" test file were "History of Turtles" to repeat > > the confusion. > > > The test file that fails (54-1) is meant to show that the > title "history of > turtles" does not describe the document which talks only > about birds. If I > change the H1 header so it also contains something about > turtles then I > think it confuses the issue. The document will then have some > text about > turtles so the title may be appropriate. > > Here are some other examples of bad titles: > "new page" > "page 1" > "my paper" > "Monday February 7" > > Would using one of these titles make the 'bad' example clearer? > > Chris > > Links to test cases under discussion below: > > > > 50 - Document contains a TITLE element. > > > http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/tests/test50.html > > > > > > 51 - TITLE is not empty > > > http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/tests/test51.html > > > > > > 53 - TITLE is not placeholder text > > > http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/tests/test53.html > > > > > > 54 - TITLE describes the document. > > > http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/tests/test54.html > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 10 February 2005 15:56:52 UTC