- From: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.its.unimelb.edu.au>
- Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 18:31:19 +1100
- To: "Ken Kipnes" <ken.kipnes@oracle.com>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Ken Kipnes writes: > All, > > Text equivalents for APPLETs must be updated if APPLET changes Applets shouldn't be treated under guideline 1.1. They are not "non-text content". If this isn't already on the issues list (and I haven't conducted a search), it should be. Any audio or image generated by an applet is non-text content, but the applet itself isn't. One could argue that anything possessing interactional behaviour is non-text content, but then, every form control would count as non-text content, which is not a desirable result. If the necessary API's are available, the user interface provided by an applet can be highly accessible. Thus apart from the question of what "non-text content" means, the guidelines should allow for the circumstance in which the applet makes proper provision for its own accessibility. I recognize this is in part a "user agent support" issue, but this case will become increasingly the norm in the lifetime of the guidelines.
Received on Wednesday, 9 February 2005 07:31:59 UTC