- From: <Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 07:27:58 -0500
- To: chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca
- Cc: "WAI WCAG List" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF9FE68A3A.A5E8950F-ON85256F9C.00431D21-85256F9C.0044DCAC@notesdev.ibm.com>
Tests #116 and #117 116 - B (bold) element is not used http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/tests/test116.html 117 - I (italic) element is not used http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/tests/test117.html conflict with one of our HTML techniques. The HTML Techniques document states: <htmltechniques quote> Avoid using the following HTML elements, and use the appropriate CSS instead. b i tt big small strike s u font basefont These elements are not prohibited, but it is recommended to either use other semantic elements or use CSS when feasible. Refer to discussion at Strongly emphasizing semantics. </htmltechniques quote> There is also a technique specifically about emphasis which DOES agree with the tests and suggests using <strong> and <em> rather than <b> and <i> so perhaps there isn't an issue with the tests but with consistency in the Techniques document. Thus one of our techniques say to avoid using <b> and <i> and use CSS but the tests say do NOT use <b> and <i> and the examples show using <strong> and <em> instead. Also, I think the success examples may be misleading. Generally the browsers italicize <em> and bold <strong> but the success examples show using either <em> or <strong> to replace the offending tag. Is this what we really want? -becky Becky Gibson Web Accessibility Architect IBM Emerging Internet Technologies 5 Technology Park Drive Westford, MA 01886 Voice: 978 399-6101; t/l 333-6101 Email: gibsonb@us.ibm.com
Received on Wednesday, 2 February 2005 12:28:31 UTC